On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:12:54AM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > From what I've seen so far, sticking to released versions of LLVM and clang > (maybe with minor fixes) would help a lot. > > What we have at the moment is a snapshot between versions before LLVM started > requiring c++11. I think this was useful at the time but I don't think it's > so useful any more - most significant actively-developed c++ programs now > require proper c++11 (including libraries and in many cases thread local > storage) or will do so in their next major release. > > I don't think we should split the port into multiple versions unless we still > have significant problems with a standard released version.
I'm with stuart here, we dont need to overcomplexify the mess that is a compiler port. Please stick to a single port, from a released version :) Landry
