> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:36:49PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > archivers/p7zip > > archivers/xz (see cvs log for the previous failed experiment) > > mail/mutt > > misc/memcached > > net/arp-scan > > net/avahi > > net/bwm-ng or some other bandwidth monitor > > net/curl > > net/cvsync > > net/ladvd and/or net/lldpd > > net/mosh > > net/ngrep > > net/openvpn > > net/rsync (N.B. setsockopt) > > net/scamper > > net/tcptraceroute (or even better, TCP support in traceroute(1) instead; > > I have a start at a diff but never got checksums to work properly) > > net/wireshark (dumpcap should be fairly easy as it uses libcap on linux. > > main program would be nicer as this runs the dangerous dissectors). > > print/cups > > security/clamav > > textproc/mupdf > > textproc/xpdf (maybe other pdf viewers - zathura etc) > > www/lynx > > www/nginx (at least until they add dlopen module support..) > > x11/dbus > > x11/rxvt-unicode > > Could you consider Tor please?
It appears you misunderstood the purpose of this mail. You could consider Tor. Understand the mail now?
