On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:01 PM Daniel Bolgheroni <dbolgher...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 03:15:32PM -0500, Dave Vandervies wrote: > > Would making gcc-linaro-bootstrap a FLAVOR of gcc-linaro, and therefore > > keeping the patches and the configuration for the bootstrap compiler in > > the same place as for the main one, be feasible? > > (The build process would then need to build both flavors of gcc-linaro, > > one to build newlib with and one to get the package people will actually > > use that depends on newlib.) > > I think the reasoning is the same as for devel/avr32, as seen here: > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=138987178409779&w=2 > > Would this make sense? > Sorry for the vague reply. This is the direction that I think makes sense for this as well. Is it feasible?
