On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 06:11:00PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Fairly old port, never imported in the past due to some weird > errors in tests, though it was always unclear whether they're > test bugs, real bugs, or just something unimportant. > > I thought I'd give it a go with a real program to see if this > is actually anything to be concerned about - tried it as an > hcache backend for mutt instead of qdbm. Seems totally fine and > the difference in speed is astounding. > > OK to import?
I was meaning to test this with mutt, but failed. Anyhow, tc port itself looks good, so okay to import.. careful, some stuff might randomly start picking it ? Landry
