Henrik Friedrichsen <[email protected]> writes: > Hey, > > On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 02:34:36PM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: >> Frankly, I see no point in having it: >> >> 1. It is developped on Archlinux and for Archlinux. Developpers seem >> to have little interest in portability, and are somewhat hostile >> towards patches for fixing things on BSDs. >> 2. Upstream is slow. It was slow when the project was actively >> developped, and now it is yet slower. Diffs and pull requests are >> reviewed mostly be people with no commit access. >> 3. Basically vimb is better in dwb's own game. > > Gotta agree with you here, except on the third argument (unfortunately > vimb has no tabs ;), but that doesn't justify keeping a broken port. > > I'd go for deleting it, unless someone else wants to maintain it who has > the time and resources to fix the current state.
Makes sense. Unless someone steps up in the next days, ok jca@ to remove it. -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
