Henrik Friedrichsen <[email protected]> writes:

> Hey,
>
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 02:34:36PM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
>> Frankly, I see no point in having it:
>> 
>>  1. It is developped on Archlinux and for Archlinux.  Developpers seem
>>     to have little interest in portability, and are somewhat hostile
>>     towards patches for fixing things on BSDs.
>>  2. Upstream is slow.  It was slow when the project was actively
>>     developped, and now it is yet slower.  Diffs and pull requests are
>>     reviewed mostly be people with no commit access.
>>  3. Basically vimb is better in dwb's own game.
>
> Gotta agree with you here, except on the third argument (unfortunately
> vimb has no tabs ;), but that doesn't justify keeping a broken port.
>
> I'd go for deleting it, unless someone else wants to maintain it who has
> the time and resources to fix the current state.

Makes sense.

Unless someone steps up in the next days, ok jca@ to remove it.

-- 
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Reply via email to