Ping. On Apr 2, 2015, at 10:51 PM, Eric Lalonde <eric.c.lalo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2015, at 3:50 AM, Stuart Henderson <st...@openbsd.org> wrote: > >> On 2015/01/19 23:09, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: >>> Eric Lalonde writes: >>>> Soundtouch has gone through at least six releases since 1.3.1. Lots of >>>> beat detection improvements and bugfixes in that time. >>>> >>>> Changelog is Section 5 on this page: >>>> http://www.surina.net/soundtouch/README.html >>>> >>>> A number of patches are no longer necessary and have been removed: >>>> patches/patch-include_STTypes_h: This is now achieved with configure >>>> argument --disable-x86-optimizations >>>> patch-source_SoundTouch_Makefile_am: Implemented upstream >>>> patches/patch-source_example_SoundStretch_Makefile_am, >>>> patch-source_example_bpm_Makefile_am: the example directory has been >>>> removed upstream. >>>> >>>> Tested on i386 and amd64. >>>> >>>> This software currently has no maintainer; I am offering to be >>>> maintainer, which this diff reflects. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> libBPM no longer exists, so the ports using it will need to be looked >>> at. Do they actually need it? >>> >>> sqlite> select fullpkgpath from ports where wantlib like '%BPM%'; >>> graphics/py-Pillow,-main >>> graphics/py-Pillow,python3,-main >>> multimedia/gstreamer-0.10/plugins-bad,-main >>> multimedia/gstreamer1/plugins-bad >> >> Pillow uses webpmux not BPM. >> >> Check gstreamer, the WANTLIB will probably just go away. > > I have updated the patches for soundtouch, gstreamer-1.0-bad-plugins, and > gst-0.10-bad-plugins appropriately to address the removal of libBPM. I have > bumped the Soundtouch.so major version due to functions being deleted from > the API. All three build fine against a recent amd64 snapshot. > > Am I missing anything? This is my first port diff impacting a library... > > - Eric > > <gst-plugins-bad-0.10.23.diff><gstreamer1-plugins-bad-1.4.5.diff><soundtouch-1.8.0.diff>
