On 2015/01/21 13:10, Brad Smith wrote: > On 01/21/15 13:07, Tim Howe wrote: > >On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:59:43 -0500 > >Brad Smith <b...@comstyle.com> wrote: > > > >>> It appears lzma was added to WANTLIB in version 1.92.2.2 of the > >>>port (tagged for OPENBSD_5_6). I don't have a handy 5.6 box to try it > >>>on, but I can put something together if needed for testing...
lzma is not in clamav's WANTLIB for 5.6 release (OPENBSD_5_6_BASE) or 5.6-stable (OPENBSD_5_6), it's only in -current. > >>So you're running something post 5.6 but not with packages fully up to > >>date it seems. liblzma came in through the libxml update to 2.9.2 > >>3 months ago. > > > > Then I must be confused in some other way. This is on a system > >that I *thought* I had updated to -current from source... It appears > >to be 5.7-beta in every other way. I'll recheck my make build process. > > Why don't you use a snapshot for base + packages? +1. As we head towards release, this is a good time to test and report any major breakage. Testing snapshots rather than self-built packages means that build issues local to your system are ruled out.
