On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 09:56:56PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:04:16AM -0500, Daniel Dickman wrote: > > a few thoughts. > > > > I'm not in love with changing CFLAGS if hostname is raccoon. i would make a > > choice to either include no-format or not. > > > > I would not run the regress tests as part of the main build but would > > disconnect it. this is how most ports work as far as I know. > > > > while my ulimit patch will let the regress tests work, I think a note might > > be desirable in pkg-readme. otherwise someone with a low ulimit -n will > > have to hunt for the same problem when they try to run. > > > > ok daniel@ if these changes are made. > > Here is a port of 0.61b that removes the hostname check > and the default regress run. > > Isn't the default fd limit 512 in login.conf now?
Yes for default login class. > How do other ports advise on limits? There used to be > a variable to set for ports that required a large data size > to build but didn't that get removed? It was VMEM_WARNING and got removed. Since afl targets i386/amd64 that shouldnt matter.. Landry
