On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:34:02PM +0100, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> writes: > > > On 2014/11/17 22:57, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > >> New tarball attached. Additionally, properly kill SMB support (won't > >> work anyway), and set CC through MAKE_FLAGS. ftp is broken too. http > >> seems to work after minimal testing, but the cpu consumption is just too > >> funny. But that's probably not a blocking problem either! > > Sorry for the mocking tone, which was driven by the gap between the poor > behavior of gatling (at least on OpenBSD) and upstream's arrogance. > > While I understand that Jan has put work in this port... > > > Considering we already have a dozen other web servers in ports which do > > work, is there really any point to import this? > > as is, I don't think so.
I wrote this port for two reasons: 1. I use gatling for quiet a while on OpenBSD (compiled in my /home) to develop and test self-written webpages/cgi-scripts. It annoys me to compile and install it in my /home an every machine in stead of just install a package. 2. I liked the software and development ideas of Fefe besides his public behavior. I don't notice that SMB and FTP support is broken. Sorry for that. I will test and may fix it this week. My personal use case is HTTP for the moment. If some one is interested in other features as well, I am willing to work on. Thanks for your time and input, Jan
