On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 09:34:15PM +0100, Erling Westenvik wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 07:43:16PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2014/10/27 20:28, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > > > frantisek holop said: > > > > the devils advocate tonight: > > > > i think this should be asked on misc@ as well. > > > > i dont know how many of those alternatives > > > > can handle pdf forms correctly. having said that > > > > i have no idea if the ports version does. > > > > > > FWIW MuPDF's homepage claims support for "form filling, javascript and > > > transitions". > > > > The form filling in mupdf didn't seem to be very useful when I last tried > > it. > > AFAIK, KDE4's "okular" is the best (only?) alternative when it comes to > form filling abilities that may be in the vicinity of Acrobat's > abilities. I've tried okular a few times on some simple forms but never > attempted any extensive testing as for how complex forms it can manage.
Seconded. When it comes to #@$!@$!@ pdf annotations, okular is the only one that "correctly" displays them. Evince is supposed to, but fails most of the times.. Landry
