On 21 Oct 2014, at 19:21, Christopher Zimmermann <chr...@openbsd.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:04:05 +0100 Anil Madhavapeddy <a...@recoil.org> > wrote: > >> I think this needs a corresponding lambda-term 1.7 update (that now >> makes camlp4 optional -- not sure if necessary or not). > > > Well, it works for me with camlp4 enabled. What do you think about just > removing lambda-term, zed and utop and importing opam-1.2rc3 ? We should wait until the final OPAM version is released (a matter of days). But it's quite convenient having utop as a binary package, and it will also work on bytecode-only architectures (which OPAM packages will not currently be cleanly installed on). I'd be in favour of leaving both in the tree. -anil
