On 2014/10/15 12:28, Nothingness wrote:
> Also an OpenVPN user,
> 
>   Now that the POODLE vuln is out, could the 5.5 version of openvpn be
> bumped to 2.3.4 please? One thing that got introduced in 2.3.3 was
> --tls-version-min so you can specify the minimum version of TLS to use.
> I can't find a way to get above TLSv1/SSLv3 using 2.3.2. 

The most I'd be happy with for -stable is something like this. However
doing this for every port which might use SSLv3 is clearly not sustainable.

Index: patches/patch-src_openvpn_ssl_openssl_c
===================================================================
RCS file: patches/patch-src_openvpn_ssl_openssl_c
diff -N patches/patch-src_openvpn_ssl_openssl_c
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ patches/patch-src_openvpn_ssl_openssl_c     15 Oct 2014 14:06:11 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+$OpenBSD$
+--- src/openvpn/ssl_openssl.c.orig     Wed Oct 15 15:05:25 2014
++++ src/openvpn/ssl_openssl.c  Wed Oct 15 15:05:07 2014
+@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ tls_ctx_set_options (struct tls_root_ctx *ctx, unsigne
+   ASSERT(NULL != ctx);
+ 
+   SSL_CTX_set_session_cache_mode (ctx->ctx, SSL_SESS_CACHE_OFF);
+-  SSL_CTX_set_options (ctx->ctx, SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE);
++  SSL_CTX_set_options (ctx->ctx, SSL_OP_SINGLE_DH_USE | SSL_OP_NO_SSLv3);
+   SSL_CTX_set_default_passwd_cb (ctx->ctx, pem_password_callback);
+ 
+   /* Require peer certificate verification */





> Noth
> 
> On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 08:39 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 07:00:43AM +0100, Ryan O'Connor wrote:
> > > There are more than 30 fixes in 2.3.4.
> > > 
> > > To see what those are, please surf to: 
> > > https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/ChangesInOpenvpn23
> > > 
> > > As OpenBSD takes security very seriously, I suppose it will provide 2.3.4 
> > > for its users.
> > 
> > Another openvpn user here.
> > 
> > Is there any particular fix you need? Skimming the change log I don't
> > see any critical fixes between 2.3.2 and 2.3.4.
> > 
> > Changing a port while the ports tree is frozen presents a huge
> > burden on the people building release packages.
> > And important fixes can always be merged into -stable later.
> > 
> 
> 

Reply via email to