On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:48:54PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > >On current this is fixed due to changes to getpwnam_r(). > > > >It is funny to see calls to getpwnam_r() in code using static buffers.... > > > >A fix for 5.5. is indeed tricky, we cannot use the result argument nor > >the return value to distinguish ERANGE and no such user. > > > >Have to think about this. > > Able to come up with anything?
Nope,
-Otto
