I don't see the point. 1) Collisions happen in other places.
2) Noone who runs into this will have read the note before they run into the situation. > Is this worth committing? > > Thanks > > > Index: current.html > =================================================================== > RCS file: /vol/openbsd/cvs/www/faq/current.html,v > retrieving revision 1.457 > diff -u -u -r1.457 current.html > --- current.html 11 Feb 2014 14:23:00 -0000 1.457 > +++ current.html 26 Feb 2014 14:44:46 -0000 > @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ > <li><a href="#20140112">2014/01/12 - freetype 2.5.2</a> > <li><a href="#20140120">2014/01/20 - amd64/i386 installboot</a> > <li><a href="#20140210">2014/02/10 - [ports] No Java on i386</a> > +<li><a href="#20140310">2014/03/10 - [ports] signify may conflict</a> > <!-- New additions go on the bottom, please --> > </ul> > > @@ -575,6 +576,13 @@ > If you rely on Java on OpenBSD, you will either need to make a new > installation > with the amd64 architecture (which supports 64-bit Intel CPUs as well as AMD > CPUs), or stay with an older version of OpenBSD. > + > +<a name="20140310"></a> > +<h3>2014/03/10 - [ports] signify may conflict</h3> > +Base now contains a binary named > +<a > href="http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=signify&sektion=1";>signify(1)</a>. > +This may cause confusion if you use the mail/signify package, as you may > +run the wrong executable. > > <hr> > <a href= "index.html"><img height= "24" width= "24" src= > "../images/back.gif" border= "0" alt="[back]"></a> >
