On 12/07/13 16:42, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 03:39:28PM -0500, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
>> On 12/05/13 05:36, Marc Espie wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 01:26:47AM -0500, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
>>>> I'd like tcllib and tklib to make use of 'tcl modules'.
>>>> Every package that can be installed as a tcl module saves one file and one
>>>> dir
>>>> and there are enough eligible packages that I think it's worth doing.
>>>> This makes use of a newer tcl packaging system that's a bit better and/or
>>>> faster.
>>>>
>>>> These should always be installend in the dir for lowest tcl version
>>>> possible, which is 8.5.
>>>> I'm concerned that ${MODTK_VERSION} in the PLIST isn't right.
>>>>
>>>> Here's the result for one package:
>>>
>>> So, make sure to look at the result of update-plist, it's not always
>>> right.
>>>
>>
>> How's this? Snippet from the port Makefile diff.
>>
>> +# We want the lowest Tcl version possible.
>> +MODTK_VERSION = 8.5
>> +
>> +# Manual target to adjust PLIST after update-plist.
>> +adj-plist:
>> + perl -pi -e 's/\$${MODTK_VERSION}/8.5/' ${PKGDIR}/PLIST
>> +
> YUCK. A big *NO*.
>
> Did you try the approach I outlined ? Namely provide longer module variables
> that would be FIRST in the substituted list.
>
It confused and frightened me.
Eventually I manned-up and so with your approach I get this in the PLIST:
lib/tcl/${MODTK_MODPATH}/autoscroll-1.1.tm
Which I don't understand much more.
Either way I get the same package file so maybe I don't actually have a problem
here?
Stu
