On 2013/10/02 11:21, Ido Admon wrote: > It was a peachy Wednesday, Oct 2 2013, 15:00:03, when Landry Breuil > wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 02:36:44PM -0400, ido...@gmail.com wrote: > > > ok here's a version with only one subpackage, the htmlviewer, and > > > FULLPKGNAME > > etc. \ > > > i can't really get webkit to build atm, so i can't test much. > > > > I dont think stuart meant this, it was rather an issue with the > > flavors handling. I think we need to keep those subpackages as they > > are for dependency reasons, just fix the pkgnames for flavoured > > builds. > > > > Landry > > well, since the bogofilter and the spamassasing don't have any > LIB_DEPENDS, only RUN_DEPENDS, how about putting them in (another...) > flavor? "spamfilters" maybe?
IIRC quirks isn't enough to handle merging two old subpackages into one new one. Rolling into the main package should work though spamassassin is a fairly hefty set of dependencies, more than many users would want I think. I would suggest keeping the original bogofilter/spamassassin subpackages and just overwriting FULLPKGNAME/FULLPKGPATH..
