On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 05:24:53PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 04:03:43PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado > wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:11:26AM +0300, Lars Engblom wrote: > > > I have been testing this on amd64 after time_t switch. It works > > > well. I tested even some date functions in racket/date. > > > > > > Is it ready to be included in ports? > > > > Racket has been ready for months but summer isn't the best season in the > > open source world. > > PFRAG.i386 and PFRAG.amd64 make no sense, there are lots of common files > there, and nothing seems arch-dependent. >
It makes sense. The files in PFRAG.* are generated from the source of the scribble docs (also the png files). There is a bug in the source and racket doesn't generate all files on i386, the file list is different between i386 and amd64. The files are named with consecutive numbers, so the content is different in some files despite of the same filename. The easiest workaround is to trim the directory from PLIST and to use PFRAG.*. I reported the bug to the doc author in February but he never replied my mail. If you want check the differences between both archs: http://download.tuxfamily.org/jod/lang/racket/bugs/doc-spatial-transformations/ -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
