> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Kenneth R Westerback > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:01:25AM +0300, Lars Engblom wrote: > >> Then I was right regarding how well known the bugs are. ??As you wrote, > >> there are even known workarounds. > > > > There are steps to diagnose YOUR problem and things to try that work for > > OTHER > > PEOPLE. Who knows what your problems are until you tell us. Even if it is > > the identical problem, your problem report could have that single new bit > > of information that reveals all. > > > >> > >> That I did not want to make double bug reports for something already > >> reported should be understandable.?? > >> > > > > Nope. > > > >> Also, somebody new to openbsd will not search the mail archives for > >> workarounds. They expect things to work out of box. Should not the > >> workarounds be enabled by default then??? > > > > Anybody new to OpenBSD will either not report bugs in which case we don't > > know about them or their problems, or be told in the gentle OpenBSD way to > > RTFML. > > Since you bring it up... /or/ when a problem gets reported, even with > great detail, it goes ignored. > > it's a crapshoot. > > at least be honest about the reality of things.
YES, let's be honest about the reality of things. Please go away and run a system that *does not ignore problems* Grass greener on the other side, right?
