On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 10:52:56 +0200 Landry Breuil <lan...@rhaalovely.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 04:31:26AM -0400, Christopher Barry wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 09:28:12 -0700 (PDT) > > Ed Ahlsen-Girard <eahlsengir...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > couple things eddie. One, dmesg is almost - ok totally useless here, > > and you're running a snapshot. HellOO! It's almost guaranteed to > > break - that's why there called snapshots for Christ's sake. > > Snapshots are usually perfectly usable, there are rare occasions when > pkgs are not in sync with the base snap, or the base snap is lagging > behind what's in cvs. Right now, that's one of the rare occasions. > > Oh, and we require people to post a dmesg when reporting problems (in > that case, the package list would help too), so dont come spreading > lies. > > > Either chill and run releases, or at least try to not post useless > > shit and whine, and try to produce some relevant error data that > > might actually helps solve the problem. That'd be helpful to people > > who create your free email client, and a geat way to show your > > appreciation. > > Wonder who needs to chill out here. I already gave the explanation for > his original error, you have no reason to come and resorts to bad > words. > > Landry > Of course you are all right. I was wrong and rude. Please accept my apology.
