On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 18:18:30 +0100 Marc Espie <es...@nerim.net> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 04:53:10PM +0100, Thomas Pfaff wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 15:34:20 +0000 > > Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > > > > > > No rcs id comment line in Makefile > > > > > > Please zap all PERMIT_* lines except PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM > > > > > There. > > > > So are PERMIT_* lines not supposed to be there when you're not > > sure, rather than saying e.g. "PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP = unsure"? > > > > Thanks. > > No, you should read the ports ml, or bsd.port.mk(5). > > PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM=Yes tends to imply that all the rest should > be Yes as well (actually, it's the case for all but 3 ports in the tree) > > So bsd.port.mk now carries out that implication. >
Ok, I updated my ports tree to pull in the bsd.port.mk PERMIT_* changes that was committed today, and mentioned in an email here yesterday (which went by me, sorry about that). I get it now. Tested on i386 and amd64.
