David Coppa: > Well, a one-line patch only for the check at line 106 ( > "msg.msg_controllen >= CMSG_SPACE (sizeof (int))" ) is sufficient > to unbreak utmp support... > > Thoughts?
Fine by me. The logic of CMSG_SPACE() vs. CMSG_LEN() on the receive side isn't clear to me either. Does anybody understand why the pt_cv_tty_group check fails? Should we use "@mode g+s" instead of "@mode 2755"? -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
