It is a build failure. See the URL in the comment in the makefile. Cheers On 20 Dec 2012 21:29, "Stuart Henderson" <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> On 2012/12/20 21:02, Edd Barrett wrote: > > Great. So OK anyone? > > Did this totally fail to build on BE machines (in which case that's ok) > or did it build but fail at runtime (in which case it needs a bump)? > >
