On 6 December 2012 07:44, Brad Smith <b...@comstyle.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 06:36:27PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: >> On 5 December 2012 02:25, Brad Smith <b...@comstyle.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 01:46:43AM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: >> >> On 5 December 2012 01:40, Brad Smith <b...@comstyle.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Although the build infrastructure allows for building >> >> > both the Gtk+2 and Gtk+3 support the resulting package >> >> > does not actually work properly trying to use both toolkits. >> >> > So do what actually makes sense and just build with one >> >> > of them. I have also improved the way plugins are handled. >> >> > >> >> >> >> err, the whole point to bring deadbeef was not to use gtk3 >> >> with audacious. i suggest not to convert deadbeef for this >> >> update. do it the next time. >> > >> > What do you mean by next time >> >> next time around if they will fix gtk3. >> >> > If by that you mean next >> > release what difference does it make? >> > >> >> gtk3 apps don't work well in fvwm2. menus get detached and >> start floating around. i've just tested you diff and it makes >> deadbeef unusable. > > To make sure we're on the same page you mean by simply clicking > on the menus at the top where it says File / Edit / View / Playback / Help > and they "detach"? >
yup. and besides gtk3 looks like crap. so would you be so kind to stop wasting my time with this and use gtk2 for deadbeef for the time being. cheers
