On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Vadim Zhukov <persg...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2012/11/4 Vadim Zhukov <persg...@gmail.com>: >> 04.11.2012 17:54 пользователь "Amit Kulkarni" <amitk...@gmail.com> написал: >> >> >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 5:28 AM, David Coppa <dco...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Amit Kulkarni <amitk...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> >> Hi all, >>> >> >>> >> Now there are 3 phonon's in the tree. >>> >> 1) py-qt4 >>> > >>> > These are just python bindings for phonon. Do not confuse between >>> > different things. >>> >>> Oops, my fault. >>> >>> Stuart, >>> Can you please hide the python bindings for phonon in py-qt4, unless >>> some port really requires it? >> >> The better solution, IMHO, will be making py-qt4 use "system" Phonon >> instead. It was already doing this in x11/kde4 port. > > Please forget this, I've mixed up x11/py-qt4 and x11/kde4/smokeqt. :-\ > > I've recently asked about getting rid of Phonon in Qt4 totally, but > got no responses so far. This is one of the KDE 4 stoppers: it's hard > to get predictable builds ATM with two libphonon.so in system. > Fortunately, we have just a few non-KDE Phonon users out there. So > I'll work on moving them to using multimedia/phonon, if there are no > objections.
Please go ahead. If minitube still works with phonon from multimedia/phonon, then I have no objections. > -- > WBR, > Vadim Zhukov
