On 2012/07/12 11:36, Jonathan Thornburg wrote: > All this makes sense. My question is, since x11/p5-Gtk2 is currently > broken, would it make sense to also mark the all the other x11/p5-Gtk2-* > ports as broken?
Nope, it would be a pain to re-enable them all. > Or do we try to localize the "broken" info, and leave > it up to try-to-build to propagate the dependencies? DPB already takes care of this and knocks these out of the build quickly.
