On 2012/04/06 07:09, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 02:02:56 +0200 > Christian Weisgerber <na...@mips.inka.de> wrote: > > > Extracting encrypted rar files is noticeably slower than unencrypted > > ones. Rar uses the standard AES-128-CBC algorithm for encryption, > > so I had the idea of using OpenSSL's optimized implementation instead > > of the generic one included with unrar. > > > > Running "unrar t" on a 1.5 GB test archive, I see a substantial > > speedup on my amd64: > > > > included AES: 1m43.74s real 1m28.22s user 0m2.35s system > > OpenSSL AES: 0m35.30s real 0m19.54s user 0m2.00s system > > > > Do we want his? If so, it could stand additional testing. > > > sure if it speeds up on extract! > can you please check the updated version with your test file?
let's get naddy's diff handled first, a change like that should ideally not be mixed up with a version update..
