On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 04:09:32AM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:39:02 +0100, Landry Breuil
> <lan...@rhaalovely.net> wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >Fx 10.0 & friends were released, if you want it to make 5.1 (which is
> >not sure at all) please test every possible usecase, esp
> >lightning/enigmail.. ports at:
> >http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-firefox/log/?h=beta
> >http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-thunderbird/log/?h=beta
> >http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/seamonkey/log/?h=beta
> >http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-firefox/log/?h=fennec
> >(all ports needs a small mozilla.port.mk diff, attached)
> >
> >packages against somewhat -current (ie gettext w/ libintl.6) in my repos
> >: http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/amd64/ http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/i386/
> >
> >It builds & runs fine on ppc too, as of beta4..
> >
> >Landry
> 
> Firefox tested on i386-current. No issues. Thanks.
> 
> Firefox 10 is the first Firefox ESR[1]. Do you have some plan
> related to ESR releases?.
>
> 1. http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/

ESR isn't really targeted to the average joe user, so unless there is a
real need and someone proves me he deploys OpenBSD desktops using
firefox in "large organizations such as universities and other schools,
county or city governments and businesses" and that he "sign up for the
Enterprise Working Group mailing list."..... in that case, _contract_ me
and i'll be happy to provide ESR ports/binaries for every supported
OpenBSD release.

Of course, ESR is supported _by mozilla_ on the platforms mozilla
supports, ie linux/win/macos/android, and by no means OpenBSD. Source
code is provided, but if it breaks/doesnt fit your expectations you're
on your own.

ESR doesn't really match the point releases previously seen in
3.5.x/3.6.x branches which received way more fixes. Oh well, we'll see
over time how it evolves.

Landry

Reply via email to