Sebastian Reitenbach <sebas...@l00-bugdead-prods.de> wrote: > > Licensing is a bit dicey. A file COPYING with the GPLv2 is included, > > so it clearly was the author's intend to release BrainCurses under > > that license. However, it doesn't actually say so anywhere. I'd be > > equally happy to go with PERMIT_* = "no license". *shrug* > > With regard to the license, how about just asking the author?
That's beside the point. It's the content of the distfile that is legally relevant. (I'll tell the author, but unless he rolls a new release with clear language, it won't change a thing.) -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
