On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 07:57:51AM -0500, Bryan wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 02:10, Marc Espie <es...@nerim.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:11:50PM -0500, Bryan wrote:
> >> Ah...  you have to have a 'clean' machine everytime?  I knew there was
> >> a catch...
> >
> > The updates switches are there as a convenience. Sometimes they don't work,
> > as some ports don't build if an older version is already there.
> >
> > "clean" builds should work every time. Non-clean builds, well, depends...
> >
> 
> Understood...  I did find that running 'make REFETCH=true fetch' on
> the entire /usr/ports reduced the amount of output on the screen.
> sometimes, the "L" section of the output would be so large that it
> would fill up and entire 1920x1080 screen, dropping the "E" section
> off the screen for about 3,000 ports...
> 
> I will give dpb a rest for a while... I don't have the assets around
> to do that.  I do have a quad core server with HT, but it's running
> mission critical apps that can't be wiped every time to run dpb.
> maybe santa will bring me a server for xmas.

chroot's your friend, that's how I do this ;)
 
> I did read dpb(1), which is how I knew about the switches... for the
> packages that errored, I was looking for something like the output
> from when you run them individually...  so I could post the issues to
> the list here...

-- 
viq

Attachment: pgp5dDkPjrQEs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to