hmm, on Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 07:54:20PM -0400, James Turner said that > Attached is the monthly or so fossil update. Tested on i386.
since some time fossil is using "normal" version numbers like 1.19, 1.20, etc. while the source distribution file still retains the date based format. is anyone else in favour of using the "normal" version number for the port? -f -- unix should be used as an adjective. - at&t
