On 04/20/11 17:39, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 06:56:46PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:I saw this, and considering the sheer number of changes to hs-* lately I wasn't surprised.It shouldn't have happened (the breakage, not the update).
Complex changes aren't without problems. You didn't let it slide and sit there. That you didn't create Haskell Hell is great... ;-) --STeve Andre'
