> Ok I did that. And now resending as inline diff and as attachment. But
> there is no mention about the patch-bin_runant_pl being removed. 

1. rm <file>
2. cvs rm <file>
3. cvs diff ...

don't worry about "cvs commit"... whoever decides to commit (and has commit 
rights) will take care of that step...

> If they approve, you can check it out for the bulk. Actually the
> previous email is much better diff because of this removed patch
> ambiguity. There is no difference between previous email and this one,
> except that the patch-bin_runant.pl is dropped from this diff.

can you email the diff to yourself and apply it? if that doesn't work you 
probably need to do some setup to make sure your diffs don't get mangled. if 
you don't know how to make that happen use alpine for your diffs (on openbsd it 
is patched by default to send diffs that aren't mangled) or just .tar.gz and 
send as an attachment...

in terms of the diff
(1) please replace kurt as maintainer with myself.
(2) did you test with the framework that you mentioned that had problems? what 
were the results?
(3) did you try to build any dependencies on openbsd? i would at least try to 
build jdk1.7, libreoffice and maybe one or two of the smaller dependencies. 
please report any breakage.

thanks.

Reply via email to