On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 05:09:19PM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 04:15:41PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > I don't think there's any possible way OpenBSD would be willing to > > place restrictions on what users might do with the software, therefore > > we may not redistribute it, so it's PERMIT_*=No. > > There's a clear consensus on PERMIT_*=no, so here's a new version with > PERMIT_*=no. > > landry@ is/was ok with this (changed) port > (http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=130013481508894&w=2, > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=130027658522756&w=2); you had your > doubts (above) and jasper@ explicitly advocated not importing it > (http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=130029302211212&w=2). Theo strongly > dislikes the license > (http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=130029335311626&w=2), but also said > "As long as the marker is correct, the ports tree can point to non-free > code." > > Could someone please import this or tell me to stop wasting everyone's > time?
I've imported it, with only minor tweaks: - set the permit markers to 'restrictive licence' as sthen suggested - tweaked the COMMENT 'client for the...' - added CONFIGURE_ENV to make sure it correctly picked bzip/lzma libs during configure. Landry
