hmm, on Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 11:51:06PM +0100, Stuart Henderson said that > On 2010/10/07 00:36, frantisek holop wrote: > > good evening, > > > > it seems like the fossil port is not very usable yet. > > i just installed it for evaluation and per FAQ tried: > > > > $ fossil clone http://www.fossil-scm.org/ fossil.fossil > > Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas > > Send: 49 1 0 0 > > Received: 397605 8642 0 0 > > Send: 10025 225 0 0 > > Received: 414607 218 20 180 > > Send: 18849 416 0 0 > > Received: 437541 403 50 350 > > Send: 37649 801 0 0 > > Received: 705943 803 53 747 > > Send: 75249 1601 0 0 > > Received: 2616207 1603 139 1461 > > Send: 150449 3201 0 0 > > Received: 4910711 3203 1223 1977 > > Send: 114776 2442 0 0 > > 2371Segmentation fault > > > > > > -f > > -- > > the word of the day is legs. now spread the word! > > > > Works for me: i386 MP -current, malloc flags FGJ, current package snap. > > I think you should talk to the maintainer or upstream with > some more details and a backtrace (build with symbols, run it > under gdb, "set args clone http://www.fossil-scm.org/ fossil.fossil", > "run").
sorry, false alarm, kernel/libc were out of sync, my bad. -f -- talk is cheap until you hire a lawyer.
