Alan R. S. Bueno <alan....@gmail.com> wrote: > > No. We got out of the cruise missile business a long time ago, since > > we don't think it is nice to explode villagers back to the dark ages. > > Nobody can predict the use someone else will do with tools, such > programming languages. If the scalpel invention (Ada) was sponsored by > a monster (DoD), for evil purposes (to kill people with precision),
Since it is a major point of OpenBSD that it is a _free_ operating system that can be used by anybody for anything (as Bob Beck loves to say: people can build baby mulching machines with it and that's okay), I don't see the point of Theo's remark. Maybe he was just in a snarky mood. But as you originally wrote: | Sorry, I don't have enough motivation to hack GCC port... And apparently, so doesn't have anybody else. Nobody is stopping people from working on Ada/gnat. > No GPL3 in the ports tree? Or only monsters like the GCC (newer > versions) will be rejected by the porters? (Again: in the *ports > tree*.) GPL3 ports are perfectly acceptable in the ports tree. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
