On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:14:28 +0200
Dawe <dawed...@gmx.de> wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:50:27 +0200
> Dawe <dawed...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:53:06 +0000 (UTC)
> > na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
> > 
> > > Christian Weisgerber <na...@openbsd.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > What are we going to do with emulators/qemu-old?
> > > > 
> > > > It is marked as only for i386 and powerpc.  However, it also requires
> > > > gcc3 to build and both of these archs now use gcc4.
> > > > 
> > > > Do we simply want to remove the port?
> > > > 
> > > > Do we want to build it with gcc3 from ports?
> > > 
> > > Given that apparently nobody is interested in testing this with
> > > gcc3 from ports, I'm now inclined to just remove it.
> > > 
> > 
> > I should be able to test this on i386 and powerpc in the next few days.
> > So if you could wait that long, perhaps we could keep the port.
> > 
> 
> Oh well, it seems like my X broke with the latest macppc snapshot.
> At least I was able to build qemu and run qemu-img :/ 
> 

Ok, I tested macppc via VNC with an openbsd and freebsd guest
system. So far no crashes or other issues.

Reply via email to