On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:14:28 +0200 Dawe <dawed...@gmx.de> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:50:27 +0200 > Dawe <dawed...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:53:06 +0000 (UTC) > > na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote: > > > > > Christian Weisgerber <na...@openbsd.org> wrote: > > > > > > > What are we going to do with emulators/qemu-old? > > > > > > > > It is marked as only for i386 and powerpc. However, it also requires > > > > gcc3 to build and both of these archs now use gcc4. > > > > > > > > Do we simply want to remove the port? > > > > > > > > Do we want to build it with gcc3 from ports? > > > > > > Given that apparently nobody is interested in testing this with > > > gcc3 from ports, I'm now inclined to just remove it. > > > > > > > I should be able to test this on i386 and powerpc in the next few days. > > So if you could wait that long, perhaps we could keep the port. > > > > Oh well, it seems like my X broke with the latest macppc snapshot. > At least I was able to build qemu and run qemu-img :/ >
Ok, I tested macppc via VNC with an openbsd and freebsd guest system. So far no crashes or other issues.