On 07/13/10 13:36, Vadim Zhukov wrote: > 2010/7/13 Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org>: >> On 2010/07/13 21:01, Vadim Zhukov wrote: >>> 2010/7/13 Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org>: >>>> On 2010/07/13 19:30, Vadim Zhukov wrote: >>>>>> o upstream appears to have rerolled the tarballs and incorporated all >>>>>> but the >>>>>> qmake associated patches. >>>>> >>>>> Yep. >>>> >>>> Sigh.... Would it really have been so hard for them to bump the >>>> version number? It's really annoying for packagers on all OS to deal >>>> with this. >>> >>> This looks like mine error: I worked with 4.0.1 source packages before >>> them got offically released, and thought they were ready to use. There >>> is 4.0.2 being accessible in the same way - it's a moving target >>> currently. >>> >>>>> 2ports@: can anyone please review/commit new ports? (attached) >>>> >>>> Will look. Seems they have changed the tarballs *again* though... >>> >>> Thanks. I downloaded source packages yesterday, and don't think them >>> were changed - maybe you just forgot to remove old distfiles? >> >> They've changed again. >> >> Your distinfo: >> >> SIZE (libfwbuilder-4.0.1.tar.gz) = 376065 >> SIZE (fwbuilder-4.0.1.tar.gz) = 5527326 >> >> New download: >> >> SIZE (libfwbuilder-4.0.1.tar.gz) = 376936 >> SIZE (fwbuilder-4.0.1.tar.gz) = 5525228 > > Damn. Either I sent wrong ports, or GMail thought it's smarter than > me. :( Resending with changed names...
These updates build and install on amd64 and i386 with the Jun 2 source tarballs. I started fwbuilder on both platforms but didn't exercise the application.
