On 2010/05/30 15:24, David Coppa wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Antoine Jacoutot <ajacou...@bsdfrog.org> > wrote: > > On Sun, 30 May 2010, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > >> On 2010/05/30 14:08, David Coppa wrote: > >> > +share/xsessions/ > >> > +share/xsessions/awesome.desktop > >> > >> does the update-desktop-database goo need to be done to take care > >> of xsessions .desktop files too? > > > > Nope. > > Maybe we want to leave the old one in the tree as x11/awesome2... > > ???
Is there an advantage to keeping 2.x which outweighs the confusion and upgrade hassle caused by having two versions? Awesome 2.x already pulls in quite a few things, so I wouldn't say either are particularly lightweight (compared to say cwm, dwm or scrotwm). And XCB is quite nice to have.
