On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 09:39:58AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 03:17:42AM +0000, Jacob Meuser wrote: > > On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 06:14:32PM +0000, Jacob Meuser wrote: > > > On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 03:53:33PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > > > > > So... cvs delete emulators/xmame & set corresponding > > > > pkgpath/pkgname/quirks/whatever in sdlmess/sdlmame so > > > > that xmame/xmess users are automatically updated to > > > > their sdl* successors ? > > > > Icanhazdiff ? > > > > > > does this look right? wasn't sure what to do about xmame+xmess, as far > > > as which of sdlmess and sdlmame should be the successor. is it possible > > > to add an ambiguity (the user would have to choose between sdlmame or > > > sdlmess) in quirks? sdlmess already has @conflict markers for > > > xmame+xmess-* and xmess-*. > > > > well, the version below is better anyway. based on texmf handling for > > teTeX->texlive. I also forgot @pkgpath markers. these are downloading/ > > building now, so I haven't actually tested yet. > > That reads good to me... if it works commit it, and kill xmame/xmess > altogether with the others audio/ candidates for the attic..
doesn't work. not sure why. maybe it has to do with xmame/xmess FLAVORS? where does the -x11 come from in the xmame/xmess package names? and, what about the old esd FLAVOR? need to account for that as well? what a (x)mess. -- jake...@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
