Hi,
I recently updated mail/courier-imap to 4.6.0. Afterwards I noticed
that my configuration didn't work anymore, because imapd was hanging
in a pretty long loop, looking for ``/tmp/fam-hacki''.
So it looks like with our 4.6.0 port FAM has been enabled by default.
I really wonder if this is right. Do people really use FAM on
OpenBSD by default? Nobody noticed that issue has well? Or maybe
I'm missing something and you can enlight me.
Otherwise I would suggest the attached diff.
Regards,
Marcus
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/courier-imap/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.57
diff -u -p -r1.57 Makefile
--- Makefile 26 Feb 2010 18:55:21 -0000 1.57
+++ Makefile 30 Mar 2010 07:31:16 -0000
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ COMMENT-pop3= pop3 server for maildir f
V= 4.6.0
DISTNAME= courier-imap-${V}
-PKGNAME-main= ${DISTNAME}
+PKGNAME-main= ${DISTNAME}p0
FULLPKGNAME-pop3= courier-pop3-${V}p0
FULLPKGPATH-pop3= mail/courier-imap,-pop3
Index: patches/patch-maildir_configure
===================================================================
RCS file: patches/patch-maildir_configure
diff -N patches/patch-maildir_configure
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ patches/patch-maildir_configure 30 Mar 2010 07:31:16 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+--- maildir/configure.orig Sat Jun 27 18:50:49 2009
++++ maildir/configure Tue Mar 30 07:32:23 2010
+@@ -18430,7 +18430,7 @@ if test "x$ac_cv_lib_fam_FAMOpen" = x""yes; then
+ LIBFAM=-lfam
+
+ cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
+-#define HAVE_FAM 1
++#define HAVE_FAM 0
+ _ACEOF
+
+
