On 26 Mar 2010, at 02:43, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> >> There is a lablgtk2 available based on gtk+2, but if the existing port >> isn't being used, is it worth the time to port the new one? >> >> http://wwwfun.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/soft/olabl/lablgtk.html >> > > it's in /usr/ports/x11/lablgtk2; both are currently used (lablgtk > only for graphics/camlimages). >
I'm fine with removing lablgtk, but camlimages will need an update to the version here: http://cristal.inria.fr/camlimages/ I'm travelling till end of next week, so if anyone else can knock up a update, I'll try it out (worth putting it in the tree soon, the current port is terribly old and buggy). Although the only reason it depends on lablgtk at all is a simple image viewer example which I'm sure noone actually uses... -anil
