On Saturday 21 November 2009 18:31:19 Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009/11/22 00:08, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:47:59PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2009/11/21 14:56, Benoit Lecocq wrote:
> > > > -...@sample ${SYSCONFDIR}/surfraw.bookmarks
> > > > share/examples/surfraw/surfraw.conf
> > > > -...@sample ${SYSCONFDIR}/surfraw.conf
> > > > +...@sample ${SYSCONFDIR}/xdg/
> > > > +...@sample ${SYSCONFDIR}/xdg/surfraw/
> > > > +...@sample ${SYSCONFDIR}/xdg/surfraw/conf
> > > > +...@sample ${SYSCONFDIR}/xdg/surfraw/surfraw.bookmarks
> > >
> > > I'm generally ok with updating this, but I don't see a good reason to
> > > move the config files, especially to somewhere non-intuitive like
> > > /etc/xdg..
> >
> > etc/xdg is the standard freedesktop.org config file subdir.. grep for it
> > in xfce/gnome PLISTs :)
>
> hmm. according to the spec, /etc/xdg/packagename is for _default_ config
> files (like we put in /usr/local/share/examples) and user-edited configs
> are still meant to be in /etc/packagename.
No. Default config files does NOT mean the same thing as the OpenBSD examples
file locations.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
