On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:32:04PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: | On 2009/10/16 10:06, Ian McWilliam wrote: | | > -SHARED_LIBS= smbclient 1.0 \ | > +SHARED_LIBS = smbclient 1.0 \ | | has anyone checked if this needs a bump? | | > # GPLv2+ | | samba 3.2 and later are GPLv3+ | | from a quick look over the packages which depend on libsmbclient, | gvfs/vfs2 are ok because they're LGPL which includes rights to | relicense under GPLv2+ | | "3. You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public | License instead of this License to a given copy of the Library. To do | this, you must alter all the notices that refer to this License, so | that they refer to the ordinary GNU General Public License, version 2, | instead of to this License." | | unless I'm mistaken (I only had a quick look but I think it's right..) | kde/base3 is GPL v2 *only* so kde/base3 would either have to be marked | PERMIT_PACKAGE_*=No or kdesamba would have to be removed or split to | a separately built port (I don't think there's a way to mark a single | subpackage PERMIT=No).
I wonder what santa thinks of all this and whether some people will
get presents for christmas this year or if they'll have to gnaw on
their toes...
Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
(SCNR)
--
>++++++++[<++++++++++>-]<+++++++.>+++[<------>-]<.>+++[<+
+++++++++++>-]<.>++[<------------>-]<+.--------------.[-]
http://www.weirdnet.nl/
pgpw9y7ZYsEOj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
