[removing tedu and brad from cc, i don't want to bore them ;-)]
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:13:32PM -0500, Fernando Quintero wrote:
> http://lists.octality.com/pipermail/cherokee-dev/2009-July/002950.html
That's not a proper fix, it's just the temporary workaround that
fixes it *now* for OpenBSD. As sthen@ pointed out, it's ok for a
quick fix to our port, but for upstream, they're repeating exactly
the same fault as the GHC people did (assuming a fixed size, and
assuming that a specific OS like OpenBSD just needs a larger but
still fixed size than some other OSs).
If OpenBSD (or any other OS) chooses to bloat up struct group (for
whatever reason) by a factor of 4, getgrnam_r(3) will fail again
for cherokee.
Ciao,
Kili
