On 2009/06/20 14:44, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:50:22AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2009/06/19 20:12, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
> > > I get a segfault on launch with mutt-1.5.20-sasl-sidebar-compressed
> > > with my config file, running -current as of 06-29-09 20:00EST
> >
> > First please try updating to the latest port in -current (1.5.20p1).
> > If you're using "unmailboxes", this will almost certainly fix it.
> >
> > If it still fails, please get some more debugging information;
> > first clean your build directory and rebuild like this:
> >
> > FLAVOR=3D"sasl sidebar compressed" DEBUG=3D"-O0 -g" INSTALL_STRIP=3D \
> >   make clean repackage reinstall
> >
> > then run it under gdb to obtain a backtrace after the segfault.
> > When it segfaults you should get the (gdb) prompt back, type
> > "bt full". Check over the output before you send it just in case
> > it has passwords or sensitive information.
> >
> > $ gdb mutt
> > ..
> > (gdb) run
> > ..
> > (gdb) bt full
> >
> >
> 
> Well compiling the version from ports fixed my segfault, although I'm
> not using unmailboxes. I should probably mention that the version I was

Great, glad it fixed it.

There were some problems with URL parsing fixed in the last commit
too, I couldn't replicate them myself but I was under the impression
it would have got further beyond startup before it crashed if that
had been the problem. Could be wrong though.

> using before was 1.5.20 from the snapshot packages. I wasn't entirely
> sure if this was the correct place to post my issue with the package,
> but I figured it was OK since packages are generated from the ports
> tree. I'm up for criticism ;)

Here is ok, though it's often helpful to contact the maintainer first
(or at least send in Cc:) since we are more likely to miss things on the
mailing lists. pkg_info <portname> gives you that information.

In general, now would be a really good time in the OpenBSD release
cycle for people to upgrade packages which they use and check they're
still functioning correctly.

Thanks
Stuart

Reply via email to