> From owner-ports+m35...@openbsd.org Tue Jun  2 13:54:05 2009
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>         d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
>         h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
>          :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
>         bh=Newop6rHLVL95uUuJur5kLmpp5yosj46fzY+QYWhg9s=;
>         b=mByLFBSSXjOsMUDhWoxScIqHJQTUhFfhjeuwCs617sCQOTIvVGbmRSaF0B475K1G+X
>          w5+OCEQ0KwmivBUUevotel5ea6sGAIha6JpwC5VC19x9NHS1qI5AIbgZCv9kvgYVNFRC
>          3Fx+CWLF59eaP4YQwuzvoPqGVTeWwQHIpNLQY=
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
>         d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
>         h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
>          :content-transfer-encoding;
>         b=oHXJ2Ab6uMnMIjIc5N30nZSexsc/EzDQo5OgZbspsRemqMt2geNfOPd5sbvSj7eMAB
>          skdLu+qjnEbRuvCVFoGKXlkFfI33P9E/63RVWNaJq5vazHXVEerQhVx2USDVxzHqqa6m
>          frGwO+mvNMjmuBFU2VatJ48ge7Y893wJQ0Suw=
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Subject: the mozilla-firefox port has a bug concerning certificates
> From: Nicolas Duillier <nicolasduill...@googlemail.com>
> To: ports@openbsd.org
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Loop: ports@openbsd.org
> Precedence: bulk
> Sender: owner-po...@openbsd.org
>
> Hello po...@openbsd.org.
>
> See the bugreport https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495637
> for a strange thing I noticed.  But the Linux binary available from
> mozilla.org does not behave like this.

does not happen in current;  resolver prefers v4.  since linucses
do that by default;  they never really triggered the problem

> I found the workaround in
> a web-forum
> [http://support.mozilla.com/tiki-view_forum_thread.php?locale=is&comments_parentId=73534&forumId=1]
> and there was no mention of OpenBSD.  So I believed this bug is not
> dependent on system.  Another web-site that will show the bug is
> https://blog.fefe.de.  What it has in common with https://www.mirbsd.org
> is they have a cacert.org certificate.
>
> Thank you for your great work on the firefox port.  I guess it was
> painful.  It seems hopeless to try to have exactly the same behavior
> like some binary.  Maybe the source has a little difference or they
> have a special build environment.  This is acknowledged with
> refreshing honesty by Mr Volkerding
> [http://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/linux/distributions/slackware/slackware-12.2/patches/source/mozilla-firefox/mozilla-firefox.SlackBuild].
>
> Best regards,
> Nicolas
>
>

Reply via email to