On Thursday 14 May 2009 15:56:33 Landry Breuil wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:40:50PM -0400, Brynet wrote: > > David Krause(david@) wrote: > > > Yep, the problem I had is fixed in the 1.1.1. I've been running with > > > that version for a while now. Unfortunately there were a lot of changes > > > between it and 1.0 and I couldn't find the relevant fix. If we could > > > find it then we could backport it. We could just use 1.1.1 in the > > > ports tree, but not sure if people would want to have a development > > > version. fluxbox does seem to have a slow devel process, so maybe that > > > would be better anyways. > > > > > > David > > > > Hi, > > > > The problem that's in 1.0.0 was fixed in 1.1.1-devel, David Krause > > (david@) confirmed this in a private email exchange in March. > > > > I quoted his message is above, also attaching my attempt as a starting > > point.. fbsetbg might need some further attention though. > > Cool.. given that fluxbox-stable has been 0.1.xx for decades, and 0.9.x > was the development version (and although rock stable), i think we can > safely move on to 1.1.1. > > Landry
I have no idea when 1.1.2 will be out but IMO we should wait for that. I had been running 1.1.1 for less than 12 hours and already caught it at least once chewing away at all the CPU time it could get. For some reason attaching ktrace resulted in no output. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
