On 2009/04/03 13:24, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > share/applications is @sample'd by desktop-file-utils. I wonder whether > > it would either make sense to change desktop-file-utils to install rather > > than @sample (I guess to do that without conflicts, we'd need to either > > sweep the tree of everything that installs to share/applications that > > does not use the desktop-file-utils goo), or whether it's worth donning > > an asbestos suit and suggesting adding it to BSD.local.dist... > > has anyone else thought about better ways to handle this? > > I don't understand what you want to achieve. Could you explain problem > in more detail for ppl who didn't read the whole thread.
I'd like "make plist" not to add /usr/local/share/applications to its generated PLISTs.
