-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Aaron W. Hsu wrote:
but if you are really concerned about security, pretty much your only hope is to either run -CURRENT or track the security updates and backport them yourself.
And then adds:
My advice to you would be to just follow -STABLE.
So, it follows that your advice would be to not be really concerned about security?
Most people who use OpenBSD are probably doing so at least in part because they are very concerned about security. Doesn't that make this disconnect curious, to say the least?
This thread doesn't inspire any more confidence in -stable ports than I have gained from the documentation, which has led me to conclude that I should generally compile and manage my own software on OpenBSD. A "stable" branch is generally understood to mean "critical security patches only", not "unmaintained" ...
- -- David Talkington dt...@drizzle.com - -- PGP key: http://www.flyingjoke.org/keys/801E3976.asc (What's this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signature) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (OpenBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJJz+voAAoJEO7jL1CAHjl2jpsH/ik4oKbQlWa4DVP3fwFVbIJT 8hrUGhFSbhjcqOTnXv29nSvM29lw2hdQIenuktgkOuC21Oze1nDBUhGojDFBorUX E1bG6Lt5jrcAd4okEOvd8HipbG1lBSXef/3gErbaEf9ntIymdVxo52VGya3tZ571 57HPJePMMGiQJO5R5JGT+ByLzOSREdjAa6dDNhFu0r9XRdutgtyGHtOThnDWVEjA EEBF0tI+qCeUbLeCVzsHFip6bHpMed9A6W0CDClC15lDlHC+awHzpNhb+rJi6v7u UQgMNeHydF5CLpH9omCnlkRLaIEGxDSAn4IQ0NSu3kIC0igBsRdFiZ2TGstk+7A= =RCjZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
