On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:47:30PM -0600, Will Maier wrote:
> Hi Ryan-
> 
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 04:39:54PM -0800, Ryan Boggs wrote:
> > I saw someone post the diffs to 1.0.0 a while back but it doesn't
> > look like the port was ever updated.  Since it looks like it was
> > updated to 1.0.2, I thought I would give it a try.
> 
> Thanks for the diff. Have you contacted the maintainer? Diffs like
> this should always go to the maintainer first, especially because
> they know the port (and the ports infrastructure in general).

I'm the maintainer, and I see the diff here now at least ;-)

> Either way, some comments on the diff:
> 
>     * The point of MODPY_EGG_VERSION is to keep PLIST updates clean.
>       In this case, MODPY_EGG_VERSION should probably be
>       1.0.2-final.
>     * Since MODPY_EGG_VERSION needs -final, PKGNAME should probably
>       become py-${LNAME}-${V}
>     * Were all the docs really collapsed into content.txt?
> 
> The last step is testing. Have you been able to test this update at
> all?

Ryan, I was stuck on the 1.0.0 update due to a nasty crash that needed
some time and I haven't been back to it. Were you able to run 1.0.2
successfully with your diffs?

-- 
Darrin Chandler            |  Phoenix BSD User Group  |  MetaBUG
dwchand...@stilyagin.com   |  http://phxbug.org/      |  http://metabug.org/
http://www.stilyagin.com/  |  Daemons in the Desert   |  Global BUG Federation

Attachment: pgpncN5B3SBAv.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to